Come on you righteeesss. Tell the truth, I smell a rat.

 You're not at work.

The Republicans can't touch you here !

 Speak up Son !  

Is it true that Republican Judges must pay to play ?

Looking at their disclosure statements they seem to give money from their campaigns to the local party ?

Is this how they insure appointments ?

My Reply:

Ernie-Smerny, you left no impression with me. I don't know you.

If we met, you were quickly forgotten.

Perhaps, it relates to your communication skills "I've was".

I can tell, all you need is a good Nascar Rebel Flag.

----- Original Message -----

Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 3:14 PM
Subject: Problems


You've been a jerk from the first day I've was introduce to you and you're still a jerk. No wonder you don't have any real friends.

Ernie

P.S. Your web site sucks

To: whistleblower@cinci.rr.com
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 8:23 PM
Subject: Hamilton County Municipal Court Judge Lisa Allen Charged with "Theft" ?


When Judge Lisa Allen can't "Shoot the Messenger" she steals the message. Opponent, Jonathan Dameron, has been campaigning on the platform that Lisa Allen is chronically late. Dameron claims Allen the wife,( or former wife, no one knows) of the courthouse adulterer, Michael Allen, is habitually late for court while police, victims, attorneys and defendants are all waiting for her to show up "Late again"

It is a well know joke at the courthouse and guaranteed to bring a laugh when anyone asks: "Was Allen on Time today ?"

Well, the Cincinnati Bar association, on Allen stated: "....... some expressed concerns about her punctuality."

The convicted "Taft" appointed Allen could not shake the trail of tardiness, so she told the Cincinnati Post that it was that adulterers fault. Well, guess what, she was "Late for Court" the same day the Post article ran. Additionally, she had the "FOP" draft propaganda stating that the reason they endorsed her was because she was considerate of Police officers time in court.

She couldn't fight reality, so Allen just incorporated Dameron's platform into her literature piece. The mailer misleads the voter and asks for votes stating: "police belong on the street, not in a waiting room" and additionally stating "importance should be placed on getting our police back on the street."

The literature piece was paid for by the Ohio Republican Party who is also being accused of misrepresentation in the "Stockdale" - "Rucker" comparable literature mailer. Stockdale, through concealed omission, suggests that he is the only candidate endorsed by the Cincinnati Bar Association.

It is believed that the judicial candidates have attempted to circumvent the cannon code by having the state party pay for the piece. Stockdale's and Allen's recent campaign financial disclosures suggest that a donation was made from their campaigns to the Hamilton County Republican party and then used to pay for the literature pieces the state party paid for. Having the state party make the misrepresentations creates the false belief that candidates will have plausible denial regarding strict cannon code governing judicial races.

Rumor has it, complaints will be filed with the Elections Commission.

Sounds like they are up to their old tricks ?

http://www.enquirer.com/editions/2004/08/14/loc_ohforfeit14.html


More to Come !

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
November 1, 2005

LET FREEDOM CLICK!
Hensarling’s Blogger Bill Aims to Protect Freedom of Speech Online


WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Congressman Jeb Hensarling (R-TX), issued the following statement regarding the Online Freedom of Speech Act, H.R. 1606:



“We hear many complaints about Americans not getting involved in the political process. In an age when only about 60 percent of eligible Americans bother to vote, any reasonable person would agree that the federal government should be encouraging more people to get active in the political process and to have their voices heard.



“Unfortunately, new federal campaign finance regulations could actually end up stifling political speech and threatening Americans’ constitutional rights. The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is expected to finalize rules and regulations that could squash not only free speech and political activism, but also impede innovation and technology, unless Congress acts now.



“The Internet has opened many new doors for political speech. In today’s e-society, websites and blogs are quickly becoming the most popular and efficient way for people to communicate, express their views, and debate the merits of candidates and causes. Clearly, we ought to embrace these newcomers to our political process instead of applying additional complex and stifling regulatory burdens.



“That is why I have introduced the Online Freedom of Speech Act (H.R. 1606) to prevent needless federal regulation of political speech over the Internet. This bill would exclude blogs, emails and other types of communications over the Internet from regulation by the FEC.



“The explosion of new technology over the last two decades has done much to democratize politics, encourage grassroots political involvement, and promote civic engagement across America. With the emergence of blogs, the Internet truly puts power in the hands of the people.

----- Original Message -----
To: whistleblower@cinci.rr.com
Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2005 12:51 PM
Subject: Judicial Candidates Make Illegal Republican Campaign Contribution ?


A call from the U.S. Supreme Court stated the 10/272005 campaign finance reports of "Rusell Mock" and "Julie Stautberg" reveals potential illegal campaign contributions to the Hamilton County Republican Party. The campaign finance reports reveal that "Mock" gave over $ 28, 000 and "Stautberg" close to $ 25,000 to the local republican party. It seems likely, the Hamilton County Republican Party had each candidate donate substantial funds from their campaigns and then spent the money, and violated election laws, on misleading advertising in support of particular candidates. While some donations to political parties are permitted, they must be used for general administration or get out the vote efforts, not in support of individual candidates.

"Stockdale" and "Allen" gave substantial amounts as well. I don't have the exact dollar amount, but, it is in the ten's of thousands.


I thought each local political party supported the candidate, not the candidate financing the party. Is this how they insure their "Convicted Taft" judicial appointments ?

Sunday, November 6th 2005 @ 11:30 AM